Comparison of Production Processes, Advantages, and Disadvantages Among PVC, PU, and TPU Leathers
Jul 26 , 2025
Comparison of Production Processes, Advantages, and Disadvantages Among PVC, PU, and TPU Leathers

I. Production Process Comparison

1. PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride) Artificial Leather Production Process

Main raw materials: PVC resin, plasticizers (e.g., DOP/DBP), stabilizers, fillers, colorants.
Basic process: Raw material mixing → Plasticization → Calendering or coating → Laminating with base fabric → Foaming (optional) → Embossing → Surface treatment → Cooling → Winding.
Key processes:

 

  • Calendering method: PVC material is rolled into a film using a multi-roller calender, then laminated with a base fabric.
  • Coating method: PVC paste is directly spread onto the base fabric and heated in an oven to form a solid film.

2. PU (Polyurethane) Artificial Leather Production Process

Main raw materials: Polyester/polyether polyol, MDI/TDI, DMF solvent, additives.
Basic process:

 

  • Wet process: Base fabric is dipped → Coated with PU slurry → Immersed in a coagulation bath (DMF-H₂O) → Washed → Dried → Surface-treated.
  • Dry process: Release paper is coated → Dried → Laminated with base fabric → Cured → Peeled off → Post-treated.
    Key differences:
  • Wet PU has good breathability, so it’s often used for high-end shoes and clothing.
  • Dry PU offers diverse surface effects, making it popular for bags and furniture.

3. TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane) Leather Production Process

Main raw materials: TPU granules (polyester or polyether type), additives.
Basic process:

 

  • Extrusion casting method: TPU is melted and extruded → Rolled into a film → Laminated with base fabric → Embossed → Cooled and shaped.
  • Blow molding method: TPU is melted and blown into a film → Combined with base material → Post-treated.
  • Coating method: TPU granules are dissolved, then coated → Dried and cured.

II. Performance Advantages and Disadvantages Analysis

PVC Artificial Leather

Advantages:

 

  • Lowest cost; raw materials are easy to obtain.
  • Mature production process; simple to process.
  • Good resistance to acids, alkalis, and weather.
  • Can be made into various colors and patterns.

 

Disadvantages:

 

  • Plasticizers easily migrate, causing hardening and brittleness.
  • Poor breathability; feels stiff.
  • Weak low-temperature performance (prone to cracking).
  • Poor environmental friendliness (contains chlorine; may have heavy metals).
  • Short service life (usually 2–3 years).

PU Artificial Leather

Advantages:

 

  • Feels closer to genuine leather: soft and elastic.
  • Better breathability and moisture permeability than PVC.
  • Good abrasion and flex resistance.
  • More biodegradable than PVC.
  • Diverse varieties (e.g., microfiber, suede-like).

 

Disadvantages:

 

  • Higher cost than PVC (about 30–50% more).
  • Complex production process (requires solvent recovery).
  • Poor hydrolysis resistance (especially polyester-based PU).
  • Prone to sticking at high temperatures and hardening at low temperatures.
  • Some products have DMF residues.

TPU Leather

Advantages:

 

  • Environmentally friendly and non-toxic (no plasticizers or halogens).
  • Excellent elasticity and abrasion resistance.
  • Good low-temperature performance (remains soft at −30℃).
  • Outstanding oil and hydrolysis resistance.
  • Can be hot-melt welded; 100% recyclable.

 

Disadvantages:

 

  • Highest raw material cost (1.5–2 times that of PU).
  • Narrow processing temperature range; difficult to control.
  • Slightly “plastic-like” feel; lower 仿真度 (simulation quality).
  • Higher cost for improved breathability versions.
  • Low market awareness.

III. Application Field Comparison

Material Main Application Fields Typical Products
PVC Low-end luggage, cover binding, car floor mats, simple furniture Student backpacks, ID holders, cheap sofas
PU Mid-to-high-end footwear, apparel, handbags, furniture, car interiors Sneaker uppers, designer bags, business sofas
TPU High-end outdoor gear, medical devices, electronic protectors Hiking shoes, wetsuits, phone cases, medical braces

IV. Environmental Performance Comparison

Production Process:

  • PVC: Chlorine-containing process; may produce dioxins.
  • PU: Requires DMF solvent recovery.
  • TPU: Mainly uses solvent-free processes.

Waste Disposal:

  • PVC: Difficult to degrade; incineration releases HCl.
  • PU: Partially biodegradable.
  • TPU: Thermoplastically recyclable; partially degradable.

Hazardous Substances:

  • PVC: May contain lead/cadmium stabilizers or phthalate plasticizers.
  • PU: May have DMF residues or amine catalysts.
  • TPU: Usually meets REACH and RoHS standards.

V. Development Trends

  • PVC: Shifting to lead-free calcium-zinc stabilizers and bio-based plasticizers.
  • PU: Water-based PU and solvent-free PU are key R&D focuses.
  • TPU: Market share grows as environmental demands rise.

 

Common trends: Bionic structures, functionalization (e.g., antibacterial, flame-retardant), and use of sustainable raw materials.

 

Each material has unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice depends on performance needs, cost, and environmental goals for specific applications. With technological advances, high-performance, eco-friendly synthetic leathers are closing the gap with natural leather.

 

(The above content is for reference only.)
Copyright © Winiw International Co.,Ltd All Rights Reserved
IPv6 network supported
Send A Message
Welcome to WINIW
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

Home

Products

About

Contact